Breaking Free from Costly Data Migration Cycles

The Hidden Cost of Continuous Data Migration

Data migration is designed to enhance operational efficiency, yet many organisations find themselves caught in a repetitive cycle of migration projects. Whether replatforming, upgrading systems, or transitioning to new vendor solutions, each data migration initiative requires significant time, resources, and focus—diverting attention from core business objectives.

At what point does a data migration cease to add value and instead become a source of disruption?

In a recent LinkedIn Live discussion, Aaron Phethean (Matatika), Richard Shenghua (Fundamenta), and Kyle Probert (The Scale Factory) explored this very issue. Why do data migrations keep recurring? Are they truly delivering business outcomes? More importantly, how can teams implement strategic, seamless data migration processes that support long-term success?

This article highlights key insights from the discussion and presents actionable strategies to improve your data migration approach, reduce hidden costs, and mitigate unnecessary vendor-led transitions.

 

Meet the Experts

  • Richard Shenghua (Fundamenta) – A data strategy and technology advisor with extensive experience in large-scale data transformation projects, including a significant Google Cloud data migration initiative that delivered a £100M P&L impact.
  • Kyle Probert (The Scale Factory) – Head of Growth at The Scale Factory, an AWS Advanced Partner specialising in enterprise-scale data migrations. Kyle brings deep insight into how organisations can navigate data migration with minimal operational disruption.
  • Aaron Phethean (Matatika) – Offering a vendor-side perspective, Aaron focuses on ensuring data migration efforts are simplified, helping organisations transition without unnecessary complexity.

 

Why Do Data Migrations Keep Repeating?

Data migration is frequently reactive. Whether prompted by outdated systems, vendor pricing changes, or contractual deadlines, organisations often engage in migration activities without aligning them to broader business goals.

  • Are data migrations solving real problems? Many projects are initiated to address legacy challenges or avoid vendor penalties but may not contribute to measurable improvements.
  • How much productivity is lost during each data migration? Months of internal resources are redirected to troubleshooting migration issues, leading to delays in value delivery and business impact.
  • Are vendors complicating data migration strategies? Proprietary models and inflexible platforms can create dependency traps, keeping organisations in an endless migration cycle.

“Many organisations migrate for the wrong reasons—vendor-driven deadlines or superficial upgrades. Data migration must be a strategic, not just technical, decision.” – Richard Shenghua

 

Strategic Approaches to More Effective Data Migration

 

Treat Data Migration as a Business Initiative

A data migration project must be driven by business value. When decisions are made based on real impact—such as cost reduction, scalability, or customer experience—the project outcomes are far more tangible.

Key Recommendations:

  • Align each data migration with measurable ROI.
  • Evaluate resource impact and timelines before commitment.
  • Schedule migrations in alignment with business cycles, not arbitrary IT calendars.

“If you can’t quantify the business value of a data migration—whether cost savings or improved performance—pause the project.” – Kyle Probert

Recognise the Hidden Costs of Data Migration

Beyond direct expenses, every data migration involves opportunity costs. The attention and capacity of technical teams are redirected away from innovation and value delivery.

Key Recommendations:

  • Avoid overburdening teams—plan migration capacity separately from business-as-usual.
  • Leverage automation tools to reduce manual effort.
  • Bring in data migration specialists to maintain momentum.

“Attempting a complex data migration while maintaining operations is unsustainable. Allocate additional capacity or expect delays.” – Aaron Phethean

 

Minimise Vendor Lock-In Risks

Often, data migration is triggered by vendor pressure. Without strategic evaluation, businesses fall into renewal traps with little negotiation leverage.

Key Recommendations:

  • Assess alternative data migration platforms before renewal.
  • Prioritise interoperability and open standards.
  • Negotiate contracts proactively to avoid cost escalations.

“Businesses shouldn’t feel forced into data migration just because of expiring contracts. Strong negotiation avoids rushed transitions.” – Richard Shenghua

 

Apply Iterative Data Migration Techniques

Avoid high-risk, full-scale migrations. A phased approach improves control and reduces operational risk.

Key Recommendations:

  • Break data migration into modular phases.
  • Execute a lift-and-shift first, then modernise.
  • Use proof-of-concepts before full implementation.

“Incremental data migration reduces errors and supports better outcomes. Iteration outperforms ‘big-bang’ methods every time.” – Kyle Probert

 

Integrating Data Migration into Long-Term Strategy

The most effective organisations embed migration-readiness into their digital strategies. Rather than treating each data migration as a one-off project, they view it as a continuous optimisation opportunity.

Best Practices:

  • Incorporate migration planning in operational reviews.
  • Maintain ongoing vendor assessments.
  • Standardise processes to streamline future data migrations.

 

Your Action Plan

If your team is repeatedly burdened by complex data migration projects, now is the time to take control. Implementing a structured data migration framework will reduce disruption, cut costs, and enhance scalability.

Watch the full LinkedIn Live event for deeper insights.

Discuss your data migration challenges with our speakers:

#Blog #Data Migrations #Strategy #Vendors

Data Leaders Digest

Stay up to date with the latest news and insights for data leaders.